Indago Trademark & Brand IP bundle
See your bundle Join the waitlist →
Bundle 02 · Trademark & Brand IP Audience · Trademark counsel, brand managers, in-house IP

Lanham §2(d) clearance,
before you file.

Structured TrademarkApplication extraction with multi-class clearance rerank — across four trademark offices, on the firm's machines.

Free trial · Clear a mark in 60 seconds
See the demos Join the waitlist →
THE REGISTRYClear before you file.
Days → minutesA multi-class clearance pass that used to take three days — finishes in seconds.
Every register, every classEUIPO + USPTO TESS + WIPO Madrid + DPMA TM · 45 Nice classes · ranked by likelihood-of-confusion, not by keyword.
§2(d) verdict pillsEvery row carries one of four verdicts: confusingly-similar · different-goods · different-mark · cumulative.
Zero riskNothing leaves the firm. Same query in 6 months → same hit set. Free trial, no SaaS. Try yourself for free →

The mark you can't afford to file blind.

Clearance, opposition watch, multi-class filing, coexistence opinions — every workflow turns on finding one earlier mark in the same goods class, often in a different stylisation, often in another office. Indago's smart ranking lets a target like "NEUROLINX" match an earlier "NeuroLink" in cl. 9 even when the letters differ, and ranks the §2(d) verdict by goods overlap, not by string distance. On the firm's machines.

I · Three questions a working TM team asks

From clearance to opposition watch to multi-class filing.

Demo 1 · Clearance · cl. 9 + cl. 420.94 ms · local
clearance · "NEUROLINX" · cl. 9 (software) + cl. 42 (SaaS) · EU + US
01
NeuroLink, registered EU mark — cl. 9 (medical SW) + cl. 10 (devices). Verdict: confusingly-similar. EUIPO · 018 412 902 · 2023 · cl. 9, 10
0.93
02
NEURALINK, US standard-character — cl. 9 (BCI hardware). Verdict: confusingly-similar. USPTO TESS · 79 388 142 · 2022 · cl. 9
0.91
03
NEURO LYNX, EU figurative — cl. 35 (consulting). Verdict: different-goods. EUIPO · 018 211 547 · 2021 · cl. 35
0.61
EUIPO + USPTO TESS · multi-class§2(d) verdict pills · anti-fab gated
Demo 2 · Opposition watch · brand portfoliowatch · weekly
opposition watch · brand "INDAGO" · cl. 9 / 35 / 42 · 30-day window · EU + DE + US
01
INDIGGO — EU application published 2026-04-22. Cl. 9 overlap. Opposition window: closes 2026-07-22. EUIPO · 018 991 314 · cl. 9, 42
0.88
02
INDAGAR — DPMA application published 2026-05-02. Cl. 42 overlap. Closes 2026-08-02. DPMA TM · 30 2026 102 442 · cl. 42
0.82
03
INTAGO — USPTO TESS published 2026-05-09. Cl. 35 only. Verdict: different-goods; monitor. USPTO TESS · 79 412 558 · cl. 35
0.58
opposition windows · class overlapdelivered as weekly watchlist-alert
Demo 3 · Multi-class filing package1.4 ms · local
filing package · "INDAGO" · cl. 9 + 35 + 42 + 45 · EU + US + DE + WIPO Madrid
01
Goods/services drafted per class, ranked by Nice register — 4 classes · 4 jurisdictions · 16 cells. Output: filing-package with chunk-resolved evidence.indago_report · filing-package · package_sha256=…
—
02
Coexistence-risk row per cell: 6 cells cumulative · 2 cells confusingly-similar · 8 cells different-goods. cross-checked against EUIPO + USPTO TESS + DPMA TM + WIPO Madrid
—
03
Render appended to journal as report.rendered. indago_journal(op=verify): intact:true · records_verified:n · head_hash:…. chain-of-custody
—
filing-package payloadjournaled · chain replayable

Demos are illustrative; the engine runs the same shape of query against your own brand portfolio and files, locally.

II · What's included

Sources, scans, workflows.

The Trademark bundle activates every trademark register, the brand-IP scan family, and the §2(d) verdict pipeline. Drop it on top of the Patent bundle for combined IP work, or alongside Legal for full opinion writing.

  • EUIPO · USPTO TESS · WIPO Madrid · DPMA TM
    Full-text trademark filings · multi-class search · 45 Nice classes · live/lapsed filter.bulk fetch · weekly delta
  • Native renderers
    tm-clearance-chart with typed chart payload · filing-package (multi-class) · watchlist-alert (opposition windows) · decision-memo for coexistence opinions.29-template surface · POST-body
  • Anti-fabrication rail
    indago_finding_emit(evidence_chunk_id=…) rejects citations whose chunk-id doesn't resolve in the index — no fabricated registration numbers.guard at emit
  • Verdict pills · Lanham §2(d)
    confusingly-similar · different-goods · different-mark · cumulative — the four verdicts used in the clearance chart.Lanham vocabulary
  • Opposition-window watchlist
    Every newly published application in your watched classes; 30-day window-close countdown; class-overlap ranking.archetype 17 · watchlist-alert
  • Chain-of-custody
    Every render appends a report.rendered event with chart_matrix_shas[] + HTML sha. indago_journal(op=verify) replays the chain. See audit chain.opinion-ready
Sources of record EUIPOUSPTO TESSWIPO MadridDPMA TM

For patent prior art (USPTO · EPO · WIPO · Google Patents · DPMA · Espacenet) see the Patent & IP bundle — with Art. 54/56 EPÜ verdicts and the native anspruchskarte renderer.

II.5 · Sample workflows

Real workflows. Real numbers.

Three workflows shaped for this bundle. The first uses the tm-clearance-chart renderer end-to-end. The other two are workflow shapes implemented in the engine — we publish numbers only when we have measured them on a customer matter.

Workflow 01 Pending validation

Multi-class clearance · SaaS brand

Trademark counsel · brand managers
  1. InputA proposed mark + the goods/services per Nice class (cl. 9 + 35 + 42) + target jurisdictions (EU + US + DE).
  2. MethodIndago indexed EUIPO + USPTO TESS + DPMA TM, ranked earlier marks by class overlap, applied Lanham §2(d) verdict pills, and rendered the result with indago_report(template="tm-clearance-chart", chart=…).
  3. OutputA clearance chart: rows = earlier marks; columns = classes × jurisdictions; verdicts in pills. Render journaled with chart_matrix_shas[].
Hours → minutes Workflow shape live; pending end-to-end test on a customer mark.
Workflow 02 Pending validation

Opposition watch · brand portfolio

In-house IP · brand managers
  1. InputYour brand portfolio (marks + classes you watch) + watched jurisdictions + alert window (default 30 days post-publication).
  2. MethodWeekly scan of EUIPO + USPTO TESS + WIPO Madrid + DPMA TM newly published applications; class-overlap ranking; §2(d) verdict pre-pill; watchlist-alert renderer.
  3. OutputA weekly digest of newly published marks in your watched classes, sorted by opposition-window-close date.
Weekly · zero-miss Workflow shape live; pending live customer portfolio dry-run.
Workflow 03 Pending validation

Coexistence opinion · multi-class memo

Trademark counsel · litigators
  1. InputA target mark + the conflicting earlier marks identified in clearance + the goods/services overlap matrix.
  2. MethodCompose the rationale into a decision-memo with the clearance chart attached, the §2(d) verdict per row, and chunk-resolved evidence to the register entries.
  3. OutputA signed HTML opinion ready for the client file; indago_journal(op=verify) replays the chain at any later date.
Days → minutes Workflow shape live; pending live opinion dry-run on a customer matter.

Verified workflows are reproducible against the index hash listed in each run. Pending workflows are a written commitment, not a customer quote — we publish numbers only when we have measured them.

Trademark & Brand IP bundle · from €499/ seat / month · firm rollouts & concurrent-user pricing available · all four registers included · journal verify for opinion work
III · Also useful for IP work
PAT · Patent & IPPrior art & AnspruchskarteUSPTO · EPO · WIPO · Google Patents · DPMA · Espacenet · Art. 54/56 EPÜ verdicts. LAW · LegalOpposition & opinion draftingEUR-Lex · court opinions · clause-anchored evidence for coexistence and licensing memos. BIZ · BusinessBrand due-diligenceCompanies House · Bundesanzeiger · SEC EDGAR — entity-of-record for brand owners.
Indago is a research tool, not a substitute for professional legal advice. Clearance and coexistence outputs are informational only and do not constitute a legal opinion. Consult qualified trademark counsel before filing.