“Half the papers behind our target don't replicate, and our own data is invisible.”
Judge targets on all the evidence.
- I can't tell which published target claims will survive when we try to reproduce them.
- Our unpublished assay data and the public literature live in two separate worlds.
- Legal banned AI chatbots after someone pasted trial results into one, so I search by hand.
- Disagreeing studies and cross-field links surfaced before a target is committed, all processed on the workstation.
- Find the 2019 failed-assay report in seconds with page-level citations; nothing leaves the machine.
- Every target-selection argument traces to a source and a timestamped decision.
Your setup. Free to start.
INDAGO Accelerate
Find the 2019 failed-assay report in seconds with page-level citations; nothing leaves the machine.
Get INDAGO — freeINDAGO Desktop
Disagreeing studies and cross-field links surfaced before a target is committed, all processed on the workstation.
Why your tools fall short.
Cloud AI assistants are prohibited for unpublished data, so the most relevant material (internal reports) cannot be used with them.
PubMed/Scopus keyword search returns papers and shows no contradictions or bridges between fields.
Enterprise search over file shares has no scientific ranking, no citations and no PDF/scan awareness.
How INDAGO answers.
Disagreeing studies and cross-field links surfaced before a target is committed, all processed on the workstation.
INDAGO AccelerateFind the 2019 failed-assay report in seconds with page-level citations; nothing leaves the machine.
INDAGO DesktopEvery target-selection argument traces to a source and a timestamped decision.
Find it in a blink.
Your documents stay on your Mac.
macOS · Apple silicon · Signed and notarised